In a revision under Art. 227, the bench found the petitioner unable to make out a case justifying interference, noting the petition appeared infructuous due to counsel's absence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 43842 of 1999
Petitioner :- Hori Lal & Others Respondent :- Nagar Nigam & Another Counsel for Petitioner :- K.G. Srivastava,Vinod Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal, J.
“ a to issue a order or direction or writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 1 to provide all consequential benefits i.e. leave encashment, increment of wages medical leave etc. which are getting other regularised colleagues to the petitioners.”
Order Date :- 15.12.2017 Akn
Hori Lal & Others
Nagar Nigam
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
