The single judge dismissed the writ petition seeking quashing of an order and regularisation of services on the post of Fitter. The court found no prima facie case for interference and the matter infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 43604 of 1999
Petitioner :- Munna Khan Respondent :- Chairman U.P. Jal Nigam And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Archana Srivastava,Pankaj Srivastava
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal, J.
“ (i) issue a writ, order in the direction in the nature of certioraris quashing the order dated 7.9.1999 Annexure 1 to the petition.
(ii) issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to permit the petitioner to continue on the post of Fitter.
(iii) issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing respondents to regularise the services of the petitioner on the post of Fitter.”
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petition succeeds in seeking quashing of an order and regularisation of services.
Whether sufficient cause is made out to justify High Court interference.
Munna Khan
Chairman U.P. Jal Nigam
Ors.
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
