The single judge in a revision under Writ A No. 43312 of 1999 dismissed a petition seeking regularisation as an Assistant Teacher and salary arrears. Finding no case for interference and noting the absence of counsel, the court deemed the matter infructuous and disposed of it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 43312 of 1999 Petitioner :- Pramod Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- P.K. Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal, J.
(iii) issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to release the entire arrears of salary with effect from 25.10.1994 till date and pay the petitioner his salary month to month in future and the petitioner be treated as regularised under the provisions of the Act.”
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the present writ petition is maintainable having no cause of action.
Whether the petitioner is eligible for regularisation and arrears of salary.
Whether the court should interfere to regularize the petitioner and grant salary arrears.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pramod Kumar
State Of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
