Allowed

Rajendra Prasad and Others v. D.D.C. and Others

Allahabad HC14 Dec 2017WRIB/6109/1983

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The single-judge court disposed of multiple miscellaneous applications in a writ petition. It condoned delay in filing substitution and restoration applications, allowed their disposal, permitted the withdrawal of the writ petition, and restored the petition after recalling a prior dismissal order.

What did the court decide?

Delay in filing substitution and restoration applications condoned; withdrawal of writ petition allowed; writ petition restored by recalling order of dismissal.

Rajendra Prasad and Others Vs D.D.C. and… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Allahabad HC (2017)

¶1

Court No. - 34 Delay Condonation Application No.311285 of 2015

¶2

¶3

Civil Misc. Substitution Application No.311286 of 2015

¶4

¶5

Case :- WRIT - B No. - 6109 of 1983

¶6

Petitioner :- Rajendra Prasad And Others Respondent :- D.D.C. & Others Counsel for Petitioner :- H.S.N. Tripathi, P.S.Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- V.C. Katiyar, S.C.

¶7

Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal, J.

¶8

This is an application seeking condonation of delay in filing substitution application. Though steps have not been taken on behalf of proposed respondents, Sri Brijesh Narain Srivastava has put in appearance.

¶9

Heard.

¶10

Cause shown for delay in filing restoration application is sufficient. Delay in filing restoration application is condoned.

¶11

The application, accordingly, stands allowed. Order Date :- 14.12.2017 Akn

¶12

Court No. - 34 Civil Misc. Substitution Application No.2108 of 1985 In Case :- WRIT - B No. - 6109 of 1983

¶13

Petitioner :- Rajendra Prasad And Others Respondent :- D.D.C. & Others Counsel for Petitioner :- H.S.N. Tripathi, P.S.Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- V.C. Katiyar, S.C.

¶14

Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal, J.

¶15

Heard.

¶16

Substitution application is allowed. Let substitution be carried out during course of the day. Order Date :- 14.12.2017 Akn

¶17

Court No. - 34 Civil Misc. Substitution Application No.311286 of 2015 In Case :- WRIT - B No. - 6109 of 1983

¶18

Petitioner :- Rajendra Prasad And Others Respondent :- D.D.C. & Others Counsel for Petitioner :- H.S.N. Tripathi, P.S.Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- V.C. Katiyar, S.C.

¶19

Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal, J.

¶20

Heard.

¶21

Substitution application is allowed. Let substitution be carried out during course of the day. Order Date :- 14.12.2017 Akn

¶22

Court No. - 34 Delay Condonation Application No.311281 of 2015

¶23

¶24

Civil Misc. Substitution Application No.311284 of 2015

¶25

¶26

Case :- WRIT - B No. - 6109 of 1983

¶27

Petitioner :- Rajendra Prasad And Others Respondent :- D.D.C. & Others Counsel for Petitioner :- H.S.N. Tripathi, P.S.Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- V.C. Katiyar, S.C.

¶28

Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal, J.

¶29

This is an application seeking condonation of delay in filing substitution application. Though steps have not been taken on behalf of proposed respondents, Sri Brijesh Narain Srivastava has put in appearance.

¶30

Heard.

¶31

Cause shown for delay in filing restoration application is sufficient. Delay in filing restoration application is condoned.

¶32

The application, accordingly, stands allowed. Order Date :- 14.12.2017 Akn

¶33

Court No. - 34 Civil Misc. Substitution Application No.311284 of 2015 In Case :- WRIT - B No. - 6109 of 1983

¶34

Petitioner :- Rajendra Prasad And Others Respondent :- D.D.C. & Others Counsel for Petitioner :- H.S.N. Tripathi, P.S.Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- V.C. Katiyar, S.C.

¶35

Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal, J.

¶36

Heard.

¶37

Substitution application is allowed. Let substitution be carried out during course of the day. Order Date :- 14.12.2017 Akn

¶38

Court No. - 34 Withdrawal Application no. 108085 of 2017

¶39

¶40

Case :- WRIT - B No. - 6109 of 1983

¶41

Petitioner :- Rajendra Prasad And Others Respondent :- D.D.C. & Others Counsel for Petitioner :- H.S.N. Tripathi, P.S.Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- V.C. Katiyar, S.C.

¶42

Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal, J.

¶43

This is an application requesting that writ petition be dismissed as withdrawn. Learned counsel appearing for respondents has no objection to the said request.

¶44

Application is allowed. Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶45

Order Date :- 14.12.2017 Akn

¶46

Court No. - 34 Civil Misc. Recall/Restoration Application No.27958 of 2017

¶47

¶48

Case :- WRIT - B No. - 6109 of 1983

¶49

Petitioner :- Rajendra Prasad And Others Respondent :- D.D.C. & Others Counsel for Petitioner :- H.S.N. Tripathi, P.S.Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- V.C. Katiyar, S.C.

¶50

Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal, J.

¶51

This is an application seeking restoration of writ petition after recall of order dated 23.12.2016 whereby writ petition was dismissed in absence of counsel for petitioner.

¶52

Reason for non-appearance has been explained satisfactorily.

¶53

Order dated 23.12.2016 is hereby recalled and writ petition is restored to its original number.

¶54

This application, accordingly, stands allowed. Order Date :- 14.12.2017 Akn

Rajendra Prasad and Others v. D.D.C. and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajendra Prasad and Others v. D.D.C. and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nageshwar Prasad Upadhyay Vs State of U.P. and Others

Raghuvendra Kumar Singh Vs Joint Director of Education and Others

Smt. Subhash Devi and Others Vs State of U.P. and Others

Sundar Lal Mittal Vs State of U.P. Thru Its Principal Secy. Secondary Edu and Ors.

Raja Bhaiya and Others Vs the Pramukh Abhiyanta P.W.D. Lko. and Others

Pramod Kumar Vs State of U.P. and Ors.