Section 11. Nodal agency
The Ministry of the Central Government dealing with Tribal Affairs or any officer or authority authorised by the Central Government in this behalf shall be the nodal agency for the implementation of the provisions of this Act.
Judgements applying section 11
No. - 2023:AHC:199398-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 29385 of 2023 Petitioner :- Bihari Respondent :- State Of U P And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- U.C. Chaturvedi,Yashvant Kumar Venvansh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon
DisposedOpenNo. - 2023:AHC:199763-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 29287 of 2023 Petitioner :- Shiv Bachan Respondent :- State Of U P And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- U.C. Chaturvedi,Yashvant Kumar Venvansh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C
DisposedOpenNo. - 2023:AHC:199398-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 29548 of 2023 Petitioner :- Bansh Raj Respondent :- State Of U P And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- U.C. Chaturvedi,Yashvant Kumar Venvansh Counsel for Respondent :- CSC Hon
DisposedOpenNo. - 2023:AHC:199398-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 29075 of 2023 Petitioner :- Shyam Sundar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- U.C. Chaturvedi,Yashvant Kumar Venvansh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S
DisposedOpenHIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA WP(C) NO.556 OF 2022 Sri Thailendra Marak Vs. The State of Tripura and ors. HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T. AMARNATH GOUD Present: For the Petitioner(s) : Mrs. R. Chakraborty, Advocate. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Kohi
DisposedOpenIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 915 WRIT PETITION NO.7028 OF 2019 DEVILAL TEJLA PATLE AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Narwadkar Mrigesh D. AGP for Respon
DisposedOpen
Show 4 more
This matter is taken up through video conferencing mode. Heard Mr. Subrata Mishra, learned counsel for the Petitioners and Miss Samapika Mishra, learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the State-Opposite Parties. The grievance of the Petitioners
DisposedOpenIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 902 WRIT PETITION NO. 65 OF 2020 Babu Bandhu Chavan and others .. Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Mrs. Pathan h/f T. W. Pathan, Advocate for
DismissedOpenIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 902 WRIT PETITION NO. 65 OF 2020 Babu Bandhu Chavan and others .. Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Mrs. Pathan h/f T. W. Pathan, Advocate for
DismissedOpenIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.11850 OF 2019 DNYANESHWAR AMRUT SUKLIKAR AND ANOTHER …PETITIONERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHRASHTRA AND OTHERS …RESPONDENTS Mr. T.W. Pathan, Advocate for petitioner
DismissedOpen