Section 8. Cognizance of offences
No court shall take cognizance of any offence under section 7 unless any forest dwelling Scheduled Tribe in case of a dispute relating to a resolution of a Gram Sabha or the Gram Sabha through a resolution against any higher authority gives a notice of not less than sixty days to the State Level Monitoring Committee and the State Level Monitoring Committee has not proceeded against such authority.
Judgements applying section 8
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 26962 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J. HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel for respondents. 2. Present petition has bee
Van Gujjar forest dwellers claimed their applications under the Forest Rights Act were pending before committees. The court held the respondents could not evict petitioners without first considering their applications as statutorily mandated.
DisposedOpenVan Gujjar; nomadic forest-dwelling community; Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006; form B and C applications; Gram Sabha resolution; SDLC; District Level Committee; DFO; Rule 4; Rule 7; Rule 8 (c); eviction restrained; self cultivation;
DisposedOpenVan Gujjar nomadic forest dwellers; Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006; Form B and Form C claims; Gram Sabha resolution; Sub-Divisional Level Committee (SDLC); District Level Committee (DLC); Rule 4, Rule 7, Rule 8(c);
DisposedOpenof 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.17400 OF 2021 Bada Sambaru@ Sambaru Malik …. Petitioner Mr. Prasanta Kumar Panda, Advocate -versus- Collector, Ganjam and others …. Opp. Parties Mr. Dhananjaya Mund, Additional Governme
DisposedOpenGAHC010157572020 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2405/2020 NASIR UDDIN AHMED S/O LATE MAZIBAR RAHMAN, R/O VILL-KALAIRDIA, P.S.-ALOPATI CHAR, DIST-BARPETA, ASSAM, P
DisposedOpen
Show 4 more
SRI JUSTICE A.V. SESHA SAI W.P.No.10023 of 2018 O R D E R: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleaders for Forests and Social Welfare for the respondents. 2. The alleged inaction on the part of the Dist
DisposedOpenAarif Budan Shaikh Vs State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary, Tribal Development Dept. and Ors.
Outcome: AllowedSAS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5032 OF 2016 Aarif Budan Shaikh, Age 46 years, residingat House No.A503, Ghansham Bhavan, Ghansoli, Sector3, Plan No.10, Navi MumbI, District Than
AllowedOpenSainath Pandhari Pujarwad Vs Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee Aurangabad through Its Member Secretary and Others
Outcome: Allowed10284.17 & ors.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.10284 OF 2017 Vilas Vitthalrao Yamode, age; 42 years, occu: service, R/o Sawarmal, Tq. Mukhed, Dist. Nanded Petitioner Versus 1 Scheduled Trib
AllowedOpenCOURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF AUGUST 2012/30TH SRAVANA 1934 Bail Appl..No. 4786 of 2012 () ------------------------------ AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN .NO./ IN WPC
DisposedOpen