Section 12. Power of entry and search
(1) Any police officer, not below the rank of a sub-inspector or any officer of State Food or Drug Administration or any other officer, holding the equivalent rank being not below the rank of Sub-Inspector of Police, authorise side by the Central Government or by the State Government may, if he has any reason to suspect that any provision of this Act has been, or is being, contravened, enter and search in the manner prescribed, at any reasonable time, any factory, building, business premises or any other place,--
(a) where any trade or commerce in cigarettes or any other tobacco products is carried on or cigarettes or any other tobacco products are produced, supplied or distributed; or
(b) where any advertisement of the cigarettes or any other tobacco products has been or is being made.
(2) The provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), shall apply to every search and seizure made under this Act.
STATE AMENDMENT
Gujarat
Amendment of Section 12 of Act 34 of 2003.--In the principal Act, in section 12, in sub-section (1),
(i) in clause (b), the words or shall be added at the end;
(ii) after clause (b), the following clause shall be added, namely:--
(c) where any hookas bar is being run.
[Vide Gujarat Act 27 of 2017, s. 4.]
Maharashtra
Amendment of section 12 of Act 34 of 2003.--In section 12 of the principal Act, in sub-section (1),--
(i) in clause (b), after the word made the word ; or shall be added;
(ii) after clause (b), the following clause shall be added, namely:--
(c) where any hookah bar is being run.
[VideMaharashtra Act 60 of 2018, s. 4.]
Rajasthan
Amendment of section 12, Central Act No. 34 of 2003.-In the existing sub-section (1) of section 12 of the principal Act,-
(i) in clause (b), for the existing punctuation mark”. “appearing at the end, the expression”; or” shall be substituted;
(ii) after the clause (b), so amended, the following shall be added, namely:-
“(c) where any hookah bar is being run.”
[VideRajasthan Act 1 of 2020, s. 4.]
Judgements applying section 12
A cafe sought protection against police interference with its flavoured hookah business. The court noted COTP Act provisions on tobacco products, labelling and seizure requirements, and disposed of the petition in terms of earlier orders, leaving authorities to decide any representation for permission according to law.
DisposedOpenThe High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking direction to inspect a cafe and permit hookah service. The Court directed respondents to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 17.09.2025 in accordance with law, noting that police have regulatory power under COTPA and City Police Act.
DisposedOpenTelangana High Court (Single Judge, N.V. Shravan Kumar J., 29-08-2025), W.P. No. 25596 of 2025 — hookah lounge prematurity; flavoured hookah; writ of mandamus against police interference refused; COTP Act 2003 (COTPA) Sections 3(b)(k)(n), 4, 4A, 6, 7, 11, 12, 13 discussed;
DismissedOpenNo.6022 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 02.04.2025 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. SAKTHIVEL CRL OP (MD) No.6022 of 2025 Rajasekar ... Petitioner/Accused No.1 Vs. The State of Tam
AllowedOpenHIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY Between: M. Jayasimha Reddy, S
DisposedOpen
Show 4 more
Batch of writ petitions by restaurant owners seeking protection against police interference with hookah service. The court held licences to run restaurants do not permit hookah centres, imposed statutory conditions including municipal charcoal licence and police permission, and directed police not to interfere if…
DisposedOpenCOURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY WR lT PETITION NO: 212'10 OF 2016 Between: AN
DisposedOpenRestaurants challenged police interference with serving flavoured hookah. The Court held hookah is a tobacco product regulated by the COTP Act; smoking is prohibited in public places except designated smoking areas where no service is permitted.
DisposedOpenHIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 30041 OF 2016 Between:
DisposedOpen