Section 23. Forfeiture of advertisement and advertisement material
Where any person has been convicted under this Act for the contravention of the provision of section 5, the advertisement and the advertisement material for cigarettes and other tobacco products may be forfeited to the Government and such advertisement and advertisement material shall be disposed of in such manner as may be prescribed by rules made under this Act.
Judgements applying section 23
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH: AMARAVATI HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, CHIEF JUSTICE & HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE D.V.S.S. SOMAYAJULU W.P.Nos.30185, 7336, 8635, 8638, 8717, 10161, 10320, 10500, 11405, 11440, 11480, 11502, 11531, 11543,
AllowedOpenHIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH: AMARAVATI HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, CHIEF JUSTICE & HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE D.V.S.S. SOMAYAJULU W.P.Nos.30185, 7336, 8635, 8638, 8717, 10161, 10320, 10500, 11405, 11440, 11480, 11502, 11531, 11543,
AllowedOpenThe High Court held that Gutka and Pan Masala containing tobacco are not 'food' under the Food Safety and Standard Act, 2006. The court quashed notifications banning these products, declaring them ultra vires as the subject matter falls under the special provisions of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act,…
AllowedOpenThis common order dismissed multiple writ petitions challenging a state notification banning Gutka and Pan Masala with Tobacco as "food." The court held that the COTPA 2003 is a special Act overriding the general FSSA 2006, and the State Food Authority lacks jurisdiction to ban such products.
AllowedOpenThe High Court held that the State Food Safety Authority lacks jurisdiction to ban Gutka and Pan Masala containing tobacco under the FSSA, 2006. Relying on Godawat Pan Masala Products, the Court ruled tobacco is regulated by COTPA, 2003, a special Act, rendering the notification ultra vires the FSSA, 2006.
AllowedOpenTwo-judge bench quashed State notifications banning Gutka and Pan Masala containing tobacco issued under the FSSA, 2006, holding tobacco products are excluded from 'food' and regulation lies under the special COTPA, 2003.
AllowedOpen
Show 4 more
This court issued a writ of mandamus directing the State Level Monitoring Committee and the Public Health Department to initiate and continue prosecution proceedings against the film producer Vijay Antony Corporation for alleged violations of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act regarding the film 'India…
AllowedOpenSingle Judge order allowing Criminal Petition to quash criminal charges against petitioner for storing tobacco. Court relied on prior findings that tobacco is not 'food' and police lack jurisdiction under FSS Act, ruling that storage does not constitute an offence.
AllowedOpenR. RAGHUNANDAN RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.8623 of 2022 ORDER: A Crime in F.I.R.No.151 of 2022 dated 26.10.2022 on the file of Sullurpet Police Station, Tirupati against the petitioners under Sections 272, 273 of Indian Penal Code and Sections
AllowedOpenR. RAGHUNANDAN RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.8566 of 2022 ORDER: A crime in F.I.R. No.317 of 2022 dated 26.07.2022 at Vedayapalem Police Station, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District against the petitioner under Sections 272, 273 of Indian Penal Code
AllowedOpen