Amita Jain v. Mrs Kanchan Dewradi
Uttarakhand HCCLCON/192/2026
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Proceedings of a contempt petition were closed upon the State's submission that the impugned writ court order was almost complied with and papers would be sent to the Treasury for disbursement within ten days.
What the court decided
AI extract
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07.05. 2026 |
CLCON No.192 of 2026 Hon’ble Rak esh Th apliyal, J. Ms. Rajni Supyal, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Anil Anthwal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. J.S. Bisht, learned Standing Counsel with Mr. Devesh Ghildiyal, learned Brief Holder for the State. 2. Mr. J.S. Bisht, learned Standing Counsel & Mr. Devesh Ghildiyal, learned Brief Holder, on instructions, informs to this Court that the order passed by the writ court is almost complied with and within ten days, after proper calculation, all papers will be sent to the Treasury for the disbursement. 3. In view of the submissions made by Mr. J.S. Bisht, learned Standing Counsel & Mr. Devesh Ghildiyal, learned Brief Holder, the proceedings of the instant contempt petition be closed. ( Rak esh Th apliy al, J.) 07.05.2026 Pant/ |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Petitioner
- respondent
State
Coram
AI extract
Rakesh Thapliyal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Uttarakhand HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- CLCON/192/2026
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court