Dismissed¶2

Girish Panuly v. State of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand HC6 May 2026CRLR/756/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Uttarakhand High Court; CRLR No. 756 of 2025; criminal revision dismissed as infructuous; Rakesh Thapliyal, J.; Bharat Chaudhary, counsel for revisionist; Himanshu Sain and Meenakshi Sharma, A.G.A. for the State; decision dated 06.05.2026; neutral citation 2026:UHC:3434.

What did the court decide?

In view of the statement of learned counsel for the revisionist that the revision is now rendered infructuous, the revision is dismissed as infructuous. ¶2

Girish Panuly Vs State of Uttarakhand — Uttarakhand HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

2026:UHC:3434

¶2

SL. No.	Dat e	Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es	COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
			CRLR No. 756 of 2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Bharat Chaudhary, learned counsel for the revisionist. 2. Mr. Himanshu Sain and Mrs. Meenakshi Sharma, learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that the instant revision is now rendered infructuous. 4. In view of the statement as given by the learned counsel for the revisionist, the revision is dismissed as infructuous.
			(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 06.05.2026 PR

¶3

2026:UHC:3434

Girish Panuly v. State of Uttarakhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Girish Panuly v. State of Uttarakhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Alim Vs State of Uttarakhand

Tanishk Bora Vs State of Uttarakhand

Tanveer and Others Vs State of Uttarakhand

Girish Panuly Vs State of Uttarakhand

Girish Panuly Vs State of Uttarakhand

Salman Vs State of Uttarakhand