and the applicant is seeking benefit of parity. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant moved anticipatory bail before the learned Sessions Judge and the same was rejected on 01.04.2026. He submits that the applicant is ready to undertake that he will cooperate with the investigation and will not temper with the evidence and influence the investigation. 5. The allegation as alleged in the FIR is with regard to the preparation of three forged power of attorneys of a lady, namely, Smt. Ritu who is living in U.S.A. and she has a bungalow at Dehradun and caretaker of which is the respondent/complainant. It is alleged that forged power of attorney is prepared in order to grab the property, owned by Smt. Ritu. 6. I have gone though with the orders passed by the Coordinate Bench granting anticipatory bail to the other co-accused, however, neither there is any deliberation nor discussion, and, after gone through with the orders passed by the Coordinate Bench, this Court granted time to the learned State Counsel to get complete instructions in the matter and also to get status of another Case Crime No. 331 of 2024 lodged at Saharnpur. In addition to this, the State Counsel was directed to bring all the power of attorneys regarding which FIR has been lodged, including the history of the present applicant Mohd. Mateen. 7. In compliance of the order of this Court, three power of attorneys are placed before this Court. Mr. Tumul Nainwal, learned A.G.A. with Ms. Sweta Dobhal, learned Brief Holder apprise to this Court that prima facie all these power of attorneys appears to be forged one, since, the lady who is living in U.S.A. and owner of Bungalow at Dehradun was impersonated by two different ladies and in the second power of attorney, the present applicant is the witness who identify the persons. All the power of attorneys now placed on record. 8. Mr. Nainwal, learned A.G.A. submits that as per the instructions, in fact, the present applicant is the main conspirator in preparing all
