Petitioner sought writ relief in a criminal matter; during hearing the State reported that investigation concluded with a charge-sheet filed on 17.12.2024, undisputed by petitioner's counsel. The court allowed the delay condonation application and dismissed the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No. | Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| WPCRL No.02 of 2025 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. |
|||
| Mr. Suhail Siddiqui, learned counsel i/b Mr. Jitendra Chaudhary, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Vipul Painuly, learned B.H. for the State. 3. In view of the grounds stated, delay condonation application (IA/2/2025) is allowed. Short counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondent nos.1 and 2 is accepted on record. 4. Learned State counsel, on the strength of instructions, submits that in this matter, after investigation, a charge-sheet has been filed on 17.12.2024. This fact is not disputed by petitioner’s counsel. 5. In such view of the matter, present petition has rendered infructuous and the same is dismissed as such. |
|||
| (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 06.03.2025 R.Dang |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the quashing petition survives after a charge-sheet was filed on 17.12.2024 following investigation?
Pankaj Purohit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
