Criminal writ petition challenging investigation; State counsel stated a charge-sheet had been filed after investigation, undisputed by petitioners, so the petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No Date |
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|
| WPCRL No.1139 of 2023 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Gaurav Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. Mr. B.C. Joshi, learned AGA along with Ms. Sweta Badola Dobhal and Mr. Vipul Painuly, learned Brief Holders for the State. |
||
| 3. Mr. T.P.S. Takuli, learned counsel for the private respondent. 4. Learned State Counsel made a statement at bar that after investigation, charge-sheet has been filed in the matter on 04.10.2023. 5. This fact is not disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner. 6. In view of the statement made by learned State Counsel, the present criminal writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 06.03.2025 AK |
Petitioners (WPCRL No.1139 of 2023)
State
Pankaj Purohit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
