Dismissed¶4

Ajay Mittal v. State of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand HC5 Mar 2025C482/601/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal for non-prosecution; absent/unrepresented applicant; single-judge bench (Pankaj Purohit, J.); decision dated 05.03.2025; case C482 No. 601 of 2024; State represented by AGA B.C. Joshi with Vipul Painly (B.H.); no statute, precedent, framed issue or quantum involved; not suitable for citation as legal authority.

What the court decided

AI extract

Ajay Mittal Vs State of Uttarakhand — Uttarakhand HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

SL. No Date	Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures	COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
		C482 No.601 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. List revised.
		2. There is no representation for the applicant.
		3. Mr. B.C. Joshi, A.G.A. with Mr. Vipul Painly, B.H. for the State. 4. The present C482 application is dismissed for non prosecution.
		(Pankaj Purohit, J.) 05.03.2025 SK

Ajay Mittal v. State of Uttarakhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Ajay Mittal v. State of Uttarakhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sangam Kumar Vs State of Uttarakhand

Gaurav Singh Vs State of Uttarakhand

Deepak Pal and Ors. Vs State of Uttarakhand

Malvi Dua Vs Superintendent of Police Distt. Nainital

Gendan Lal Vs State of Uttarakhand

Shabeena Noor Vs State of Uttarakhand