Final report in favour of the petitioners; writ petitions closed by order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No Date |
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|
| WPCRL No.1516 of 2022 With WPCRL No.1486 of 2022 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Devansh Dhiman, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate for the petitioners. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, A.G.A. with Ms. S.B. Dobhal, B.H. for the State. 3. There is no representation for the respondents. 4. State counsel, on instructions, which are taken on record, submitted that after investigation a final report dated 19.04.2023 has been submitted in favour of the petitioners, in both these writ petitions. 5. In view of the submission made by counsel for the parties, nothing remains to be decided in these writ petitions. 6. Accordingly the writ petitions are closed. |
||
| (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 01.08.2025 SK |
Pankaj Purohit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
