Kuldeep Singh Chauhan v. State of Uttarakhand Senior Superintendent of Police Haridwar
Case brief
What is this about?
Two criminal-side writ petitions (WPCRL No.1516 of 2022 and WPCRL No.1486 of 2022) heard together before Pankaj Purohit, J.; decided 01.08.2025. State counsel (S.C. Dumka, A.G.A. with S.B. Dobhal, B.H.) stated on instructions that the post-investigation final report dated 19.04.2023 favoured the petitioners; petitioners' advocates were Devansh Dhiman (holding brief of Parikshit Saini); no representation appeared for the respondents. The court found nothing remained to be decided and closed both petitions. Useful for searches on moot/closed criminal writ petitions following a favourable final report; no statutory provisions or precedents cited.
What did the court decide?
No substantive relief adjudicated; both writ petitions (WPCRL No.1516 of 2022 and WPCRL No.1486 of 2022) were closed as nothing remained to be decided following the final report dated 19.04.2023 submitted in favour of the petitioners.