Since the main prayer was answered, the court ordered no further orders to be passed and disposed of the writ petition.
No further orders were required as the main prayer had been answered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Dat e | Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| WPPIL No.60 of 2024 Hon'ble Rit u Bah r i, C.J. Hon’ble Rak esh Th apliyal, J. |
|||
| Mr. Abhishek Sati, learned counsel, |
|||
holding brief of Mr. D.K. Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioner. |
|||
| 2. Mr. B.S. Parihar, learned Standing Counsel, for the State/ 1, 2, 4 and 5 . |
|||
| 3. Mr. Anil Kr. Bisht, learned counsel for the respondent no.3. |
|||
| 4. Mr. Raveendra Singh Bisht, learned counsel, for respondent no.6. |
|||
| 5. Mr. Vipul Sharma, learned counsel, for the respondent no.7. |
|||
| 6. Learned counsel for the respondent no.7, has informed that the tender has been floated |
|||
| on 14.06.2024, for construction of the “Gowshala”. |
|||
| 7. Since the main prayer has now been |
|||
| answered, no further orders are required to |
| be passed. | |
|---|---|
| 8. I n view of the disposed of. |
above, the writ petition is |
| ( Rak esh Th apliy al, J) NR/ |
( Rit u Bah r i, CJ) 02.07.2024 |
Petitioner
State
Ritu Bhardwaj
Rakesh Thaplial
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
