Dismissed
Vinay Kumar v. Nagar Palika Parishad Jaspur
Uttarakhand HCWPMB/161/2023
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAI NI TAL
HON’BLE THE CHI EF JUSTI CE MS. RI TU BAHRI
AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE RAKESH THAPLI YAL
W RI T PETI TI ON ( M/ B) NO. 1 6 1 OF 2 0 2 3
0 1 ST JULY, 2 0 24
Vinay Kumar …..Petitioner.
Versus
Nagar Palika Parishad Jaspur & another ….Respondents.
Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr. Parikshit Saini, learned counsel. Counsel for the Respondents : Mr. A.M. Saklani, learned counsel.
Th e Cou r t m ade t h e follow in g :
JUDGMENT: ( per Hon ’ble The Chief Ju st ice Ms. Rit u Bah r i)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
present writ petition has now become infructuous.
3. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.
( RI TU BAHRI , C.J.)
( RAKESH THAPLI YAL, J.)
Dated: 01st July, 2024 NISHANT
Vinay Kumar
Nagar Palika Parishad Jaspur
another
Ritu Bahri
Rakesh Thapliyal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court