The petitioners informed the court that they did not wish to press the writ petition. The court noted that the civil appeal arising from the same dispute had been decided on merits. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as the relief claimed no longer survived.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:UHC:9225
| SL. No. |
Dat e | Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es |
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS No.3259 of 2017 Hon’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, A.C.J. Ms. Ruchika Negi, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Sandeep Kothari, Advocate for the petitioners. There is no representation for the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners do not want to press the writ petition. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3. The report dated 20.11.2024 received from learned Ist Additional District Judge, Rishikesh, District Dehradun indicates that Civil Appeal No.126 of 2015 filed by petitioners has been decided on merits, on 29.11.2019. 4. After decision in the said Appeal, the relief, as claimed in the writ petition, do not survive. |
|||
| 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. |
|||
| ( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, A.C.J.) 09.12.2024 Arpan |
Digitally signed by ARPAN JAISWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eabb68a3895e41937c266c23964c0485365445e 3a20dddb7393398f9fe45ba3e, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=060FC17022BEAE3DE215D68D9D454C51 09CB987446351E4DF04AADAA2C2CEA66, cn=ARPAN JAISWAL Date: 2024.12.09 14:45:22 +05'30'
ARPAN JAISWAL
Petitioners
Respondents
Manoj Kumar Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
