Prashant Shivdas Pathak v. State of Uttarakhand
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; counsel for petitioner and State stated it had become infructuous due to subsequent events.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; counsel for petitioner and State stated it had become infructuous due to subsequent events.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:UHC:9159
| SL. No. |
Dat e | Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es |
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL No.164 of 2021 Hon’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, A.C.J. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mr. Partiosh Dalakoti, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rakesh Kumar Joshi, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand. |
|||
| 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous, due to subsequent events. |
|||
| 3. Learned State Counsel also makes similar statement. 4. In such view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. |
|||
| ( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, A.C.J.) 06.12.2024 Arpan ARPAN JAISWAL Digitally signed by ARPAN JAISWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eabb68a3895e41937c266c23964c 0485365445e3a20dddb7393398f9fe45ba3e , postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=060FC17022BEAE3DE215D6 8D9D454C5109CB987446351E4DF04AADA A2C2CEA66, cn=ARPAN JAISWAL Date: 2024.12.09 14:53:21 +05'30' |
2024:UHC:9159
Manoj Kumar Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court