Criminal writ petition withdrawn after parties arrived at an amicable settlement; the court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn, vacating any interim order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| W PCRL 4 8 / 2 0 2 4 Hon’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J. Hon’ble Pank aj Pu r oh it , J. |
|||
| Mr. Subhash Chand Burman, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. J.S. Virk, Dy. Advocate General, for the State. |
|||
| (2) Mr. Subhash Chand Burman, learned Counsel for the petitioners, seeks perm ission to withdraw the writ petition as, according to him, parties have arrived at am icable settlement. (3) For the reasons indicated in the withdrawal application (IA/ 2/ 2024), the same is allowed. Writ petition is dism issed as withdrawn. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. |
|||
| ( Pan k aj Pu r oh it , J.)( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.) 3 .6 .2 0 2 4 Pr |
Manoj Kumar Tiwari
Pankaj Purohit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
