Court disposed of a public interest writ petition as infructuous because the respondent obtained the required No Objection Certificate and the culvert construction had already commenced significantly during the pendency of the proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| WPPIL No.148 of 2020 Sh r i San j aya Kum ar Mish r a, ACJ. Sh r i Ram esh Ch an dr a Kh ulbe, J. Mr. Shariq Khurshid, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Gaurav Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. BPS Mer, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand. Mr. Kailash Chandra, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Gopal K. Verma, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State of Uttar Pradesh. Ms. Shefali Singh, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Himanshu Pal, learned counsel for respondent nos.5 and 6. Heard learned counsels for both the parties. |
|||
| In this writ petition, filed in the nature of public interest litigation, the petitioner seeks a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent nos.1 to 3 not to construct the culvert over the land of the southern side of River Pathri Roh situated in Khasra no.454 of Village Santarshah, Pargana & Tehsil Roorkee, District Haridwar, without obtaining permission/ No objection certificate from the respondent no.4, along with proper survey of flow of flood water in the area, such that a particular area may be prevented from getting excessively flooded. |
| It is submitted by learned Counsel appearing for |
|---|
| the State Government that during the pendency of |
| writ petition, a ‘No Objection Certificate’ has been |
| obtained from the respondent no.4, and the |
| construction of culvert has already been started, and |
| that, it has advanced to a substantial extent. In that view of the matter, the writ application |
| has become infructuous. |
| As a result, the writ application is disposed of as |
| such. |
| ( R.C. Khu lbe, J.) ( S.K. Mish r a, ACJ.) 09.03.2022 RD/ RB |
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shri Sanjaya Kumar Mishra
State of Uttarakhand
State of Uttar Pradesh
R.C. Khulbe, J.
S.K. Mishra, ACJ.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
