High Court of Uttarakhand dismissed a writ petition in writ petition (CRL) No. 11 of 2021 as infructuous on the counsel's submission that the matter is settled and no protection is needed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
SRI JUSTICE S.K. MISHRA, A.C.J.
AND
SRI JUSTICE R.C. KHULBE, J.
WRIT PETITION (CRL) NO. 11 OF 2021
05th MARCH, 2022
BETWEEN :
Pooja & another And
…..Petitioners.
State of Uttarakhand & others
….Respondents.
| Counsel for the Petitioners | : | Mr. Deep Chandra Joshi, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Dharmesh Kumar, learned counsel. |
|---|---|---|
| Counsel for the Respondents | : | Mr. J.S. Virk, learned Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.K. Joshi, learned Brief Holder for the State. |
Upon hearing the learned Counsel, the Court made the following
JUDGMENT : ( per Sri S.K. Mishra, A.C.J.)
Mr. Deep Chandra Joshi, the learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Dharmesh Kumar, the learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that now, things have been settled down and there is no need of protection to the petitioners.
dismissed as infructuous.
(R.C. KHULBE, J.)
Dated: 05TH March, 2022 NISHANT
Pooja & another
State of Uttarakhand & others
S.K. MISHRA
R.C. KHULBE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
