Dismissed
Harish Lal v. State of Uttarakhand
Uttarakhand HCWPMS/721/2022
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
What the court decided
AI extract
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12.04.2022 | WPMS No. 721 of 2022 Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J. Mr. Shivanand Bhatt, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel, for the State. The learned counsel for the petitioner makes a statement at the Bar that he does not want to press the present writ petition. The writ petition is hereby dismissed as withdrawn. |
||
| (Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.) 12.04.2022 Mahinder/ |
Writ Petitioner
State
Sharad Kumar Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court