The High Court dismissed Writ Petition MS No.2891 of 2015 withdrawn by the Senior Counsel for the petitioner, with liberty reserved to file a fresh petition subject to survival of cause of action.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition if cause of action survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| Sl. No | Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| WPMS No.2891 of 2015 Hon’ble Sh ar ad Ku m ar Sh ar m a, J. Mr. Arvind Vashistha, Senior Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Lalit Sharma, CGSC, for the Union of India. |
|||
| After arguing for some time, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the writ petition with the liberty reserved for him to file a fresh, subject to the condition that if any cause of action still survives for him. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, subject to the aforesaid liberty. ( Sh ar ad Ku m ar Sh ar m a, J.) 12.04.2022 NR/ |
Unspecified Petitioner
Union of India
Shard Kumar Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
