Dismissed
Jagdish Singh Panwar v. State of Uttarkhand
Uttarakhand HCWPMS/175/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
What the court decided
AI extract
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No. |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS No. 175 of 2021 Shri Sanjaya Kumar Mishra, ACJ. Shri Ramesh Chandra Khulbe, J. None appears for the petitioner. Mr. A.S. Rawat, learned Special Counsel assisted by Mr. Pradeep Joshi, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. Mr. A.S. Rawat, learned Special Counsel for the State submits that the policy that has been challenged is now repealed. Consequently, present writ petition has become infructuous. In view of the above statement, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. |
|---|---|---|---|
(R.C. Khulbe, J.) (S.K. Mishra, ACJ.) 05.03.2022 A/- |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition is maintainable after the repeal of the challenged policy.
Shri Sanjaya Kumar Mishra
Shri Ramesh Chandra Khulbe
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court