Writ petition disposed as infructuous due to receded threat perception. Petitioners allowed to recall or modify if fresh cause of action arises.
Petitioners granted liberty to move appropriate application for recall/modification if fresh cause of action arises.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No. |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| WPCRL No. 1586 of 2020 Shri Sanjaya Kumar Mishra, ACJ. Shri Ramesh Chandra Khulbe, J. None appears for the petitioners. Mr. J.S. Virk, learned Deputy Advocate General with Mr. Rakesh Joshi, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand. Interim protection was granted on 01.10.2020, thereafter none appears for the petitioners. We are of the view that threat perception to the petitioners might have receded in the meantime. Hence, writ application is disposed of as infructuous. However, any fresh cause of action arises or the original cause of action still persists, then, the petitioners are at liberty to move appropriate application for recall/ modification of the order. |
|||
(R.C. Khulbe, J.) (S.K. Mishra, ACJ.) 04.03.2022 A/- |
Sanjaya Kumar Mishra
Ramesh Chandra Khulbe
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
