Dismissed
Shravan Kumar v. State of Uttarakhand
Uttarakhand HCBA1/353/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The judgment dismisses the bail application as it has rendered infructuous.
What the court decided
AI extract
The judgment dismisses the bail application as it has rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS BAI No. 353 of 2022 Hon’ble N.S. Dh an ik , J . Ms. Shalini Thakral, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. S.K. Shandilya, learned counsel for the applicant. Mrs. Mamta Joshi, learned Brief Holder for the State. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the bail application has rendered infructuous. I n view of the above, the present bail application is dismissed as infructuous. ( N.S. Dhan ik , J.) 04.04.2022 SB |
|---|
Applicant
State
N.S. Dhanik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court