Disposed
Kakey Babu v. State of Uttarakhand
Uttarakhand HCBA1/680/2022
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
What the court decided
AI extract
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| BAI No. 680 of 2022 Hon’ble N.S. Dh an ik , J . |
|||
| Mr. Sanjay Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant. Mr. Ranjan Ghildiyal, learned A.G.A. for the State. Heard on correction application bearing MCC No. 01 of 2022, which is not seriously opposed by learned State Counsel. Correction application is allowed. Let the words “BAI No. 680 of 2020” be substituted by the words “BAI No. 680 of 2022” in the cause title of order dated 01.04.2022. The order dated 01.04.2022 stands corrected accordingly. |
|||
( N.S. Dhan ik , J.) 05.05.2022 SB |
Unknown Applicant
State
N.S. Dhanik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court