Dismissed
Smt.Pallavi Singh Alias Manju v. Jitendra Singh
Uttarakhand HCCRLR/161/2015
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
non-admitted revision dismissed for want of prosecution as no party appeared
What the court decided
AI extract
non-admitted revision dismissed for want of prosecution as no party appeared
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS CRLR No.161 of 2015 Hon’ble N.S. Dhanik, J. None turns up for the parties. This is a non-admitted revision. Hence, the present revision is dismissed for want of prosecution. |
|---|---|---|---|
| (N.S. Dhanik, J.) 01.04.2022 RV |
N.S. Dhanik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court