Disposed
Shashti Ballabh Pandey v. State of Uttarakhand
Uttarakhand HCWPSB/385/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
What the court decided
AI extract
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| WPSB No. 385 of 2021 Hon’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J. Hon’ble Alok Ku m ar Ver m a, J. |
|||
| Mr. Rakesh Thapliyal, Senior |
|||
| Advocate, assisted by Mr. Pankaj |
|||
| Chaturvedi, Advocate for the |
|||
| petitioner/ applicant. | |||
| Mr. Mohit Maulekhi, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand. |
|||
| Heard learned counsel for the parties. Considering the facts mentioned in the Correction Application and also in the interest of justice, Correction Application (MCC No. 02 of 2021) is allowed. |
|||
| Accordingly, in the order dated 06.09.2021, the expression “Director, Animal Husbandry, Dehradun” be read as “Secretary, Animal Husbandry, |
|||
| Government of Uttarakhand, Dehradun (respondent no. 1)”. Let a certified copy of this order be issued today itself. |
|||
( Alok Ku m ar Ver m a, J.) ( Man oj K. Tiw ar i, J.) 08.09.2021 Navin |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the correction application regarding the respondent's designation should be allowed in the interest of justice.
Petitioner/Aplicant
State of Uttarakhand (Secretary, Animal Husbandry, Dehradun)
Manoj Kumar Tiwari
Alok Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court