Disposed
Radhey Shyam Goyal v. Union of India
Uttarakhand HCWPMS/242/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
What the court decided
AI extract
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| WPMS No. 242 of 2019 Hon’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J. Mr. Rajendra Singh Azad, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Sharma, Standing Counsel for the Union of India. Heard learned counsel for the parties. This withdrawal application (I.A. No. 3013 of 2021) has been filed on behalf of petitioner. In view of the facts mentioned in the withdrawal application, withdrawal application is allowed. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. |
|||
| ( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.) 10.11.2021 Nahid |
Petitioner
Union of India
Manoj Kumar Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court