This court held that a contempt petition alleging violation of an interim order has no cause of action as the underlying writ petition was already dismissed, resulting in the closure of the contempt petition.
Contempt notice issued to respondents is discharged and the contempt petition is closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS CLCON No. 276 of 2018 Hon’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mr. P.S. Bisht, Advocate for the petitioner. |
|||
| Ms. Prabha Naithani, Advocate for respondent nos. 1 to 8. Since the writ petition has been dismissed, therefore, this contempt petition in which the allegation is that interim order passed in such writ petition has been violated, does not survive anymore. Accordingly the contempt petition is closed. Contempt notices issued to respondents are hereby discharged. cONTM ( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.) 10.11.2021 Nahid |
Manoj Kumar Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
