Meena v. State of Uttakahand
Case brief
What is this about?
Single-judge order dismissing a writ petition for non-prosecution and vacating an interim order.
What did the court decide?
dismissal of the writ petition for non-prosecution; vacation of the interim order.
What the court decided
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| WPCRL No.36 of 2021 Hon’ble R.C. Khulbe, J. None is present for the petitioners. Mr. Sachin Panwar, learned B.H. for the State. None is present for the petitioners even in the revised call. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Interim order is hereby vacated. |
|||
| (R.C. Khulbe, J.) 18.11.2021 Sukhbant |
Coram
R.C. Khulbe
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Uttarakhand HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- WPCRL/36/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court