Divakaruni Venkateshwar Rao Alias Benny v. Sate of Uttarakhand
Case brief
What is this about?
Revision dismissed as abated due to the death of the revisionist.
What did the court decide?
Revision dismissed as abated.
Revision dismissed as abated due to the death of the revisionist.
Revision dismissed as abated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| CRLR No.50 of 2009 Hon’ble R.C. Khulbe, J. Mr. Lalit Sharma, learned counsel for the revisionist. Mr. Siddhartha Bisht, learned B.H. for the State. As per the report, the revisionist has passed away. Accordingly, the present revision is dismissed as abated. |
|||
| (R.C. Khulbe, J.) 18.11.2021 BS |
Revisionist (Deceased)
State
R.C. Khulbe
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court