Dismissed
Ranbir Singh v. State of Uttarkahand
Uttarakhand HCWPCRL/249/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
What the court decided
AI extract
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 5 .1 0 .2 0 2 1 | WPCRL No. 249 of 2021 Hon’ble Alok Ku m ar Ver m a, J. Heard Mr. Naveen Singh Bisht, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, learned A.G.A. assisted by Mr. Pramod Tiwari, learned Brief Holder for the State. The learned counsel for the State submitted that the charge-sheet has been filed in this matter. In view of the above submission, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the present criminal writ petition has now become infructuous. The Criminal Writ Petition No.249 of 2021 is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order dated 12.03.2021 stands vacated. ( Alok Ku m ar Ver m a, J.) 0 5 .1 0 .2 0 2 1 Neha |
Petitioner
State
Alo Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court