Dismissed
Shivmurti v. State of Uttarakhand
Uttarakhand HCABA/87/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
What the court decided
AI extract
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 5 .1 0 .2 0 2 1 | ABA No. 87 of 2021 Hon’ble Alok Ku m ar Ver m a, J. Heard Mr. Navneet Kaushik, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, learned AGA with Mr. P.S. Uniyal, learned Brief Holder for the State. Mr. Navneet Kaushik, the learned counsel appearing for the applicant submitted that the applicant has been granted anticipatory bail by the Arresting Officer. The learned counsel for the applicant further submitted that this anticipatory bail application has now become infructuous. At the request of the learned counsel for the applicant, the Anticipatory Bail Application No.87 of 2021 is dismissed as infructuous. ( Alok Ku m ar Ver m a, J.) 0 5 .1 0 .2 0 2 1 Pant/ |
The Applicant
The State
Alok Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court