This court dismissed a writ petition as infructuous because the investigation was completed and a charge sheet was submitted, rendering the writ proceeding unnecessary.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| WPCRL No. 2188 of 2020 Hon’ble R.C. Kh u lbe, J. Mr. Pankaj Semal, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Parikshit Saini, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Kuldeep Rawal, learned A.G.A. for the State. It is submitted by the learned State Counsel that in the present matter after completion of investigation charge sheet has been submitted. In view of the above, the matter is rendered infructuous. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. |
|||
| ( R.C. Kh u lbe, J.) 0 5 .1 0 .2 0 2 1 Parul |
Petitioner
State
R.C. Khulbe
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
