Writ petition dismissed as infructuous upon submission of charge sheet indicating completion of investigation, with no substantive legal proposition articulated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| WPCRL No. 1020 of 2021 Hon’ble R.C. Kh u lbe, J. Mr. Maneesh Bisht, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Vipul Sharma , learned counsel for the petitioner. Ms. Lata Negi, learned Brief Holder for the State. Mr. Akshay Pradhan, learned counsel for the private respondent. It is submitted by the learned State Counsel that in the present matter after completion of investigation charge sheet has been submitted. In view of the above, the matter is rendered infructuous. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. |
|||
| ( R.C. Kh u lbe, J.) 0 5 .1 0 .2 0 2 1 Parul |
Petitioner
State
Private Respondent
R.C. Khulbe
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
