Faizan Ahmad v. State of Uttarakhand
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought quashing of an FIR under Articles 226 and 41 of Cr.P.C. The Court disposed of the petition as it was sub-similar to an earlier writ petition where protection was granted to co-accused. The investigating officer was directed to follow Section 41 Cr.P.C.
What did the court decide?
The FIR stands disposed; I.O. directed to follow Section 41 Cr.P.C. Pending application also disposed.