The single-judge High Court bench held that a criminal writ petition becomes infructuous upon the State filing of a charge-sheet. Consequently, the petition was dismissed and the earlier interim order was vacated.
Criminal Writ Petition dismissed as infructuous; interim order dated 11.09.2020 vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 3 .1 2 .2 0 2 1 | WPCRL No.1315 of 2020 Hon’ble Alok Ku m ar Ver m a, J. Heard Mr. Ravi Bisht, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Aditya Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. S.S. Adhikari, learned Deputy Advocate General assisted by Mr. B.S. Thind, learned Brief Holder for the State. The learned counsel appearing for the State submitted that the charge- sheet has been filed in the matter before the concerned court. In view of the above submission, the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that this criminal writ petition has now become infructuous. The Criminal Writ Petition No.1315 of 2020 is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order dated 11.09.2020 stands vacated. ( Alok Ku m ar Ver m a, J.) 0 3 .1 2 .2 0 2 1 JKJ/ Neha |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal writ petition became infructuous upon the filing of the charge-sheet by the State.
Petitioners
State
Alok Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
