The High Court held that a criminal writ petition became infructuous after the filing of a charge-sheet by the State. Consequently, the petition was dismissed and the interim order was vacated.
Petition dismissed as infructuous; interim order dated 15.10.2020 vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 3 .1 2 .2 0 2 1 | WPCRL No.1242 of 2020 Hon’ble Alok Ku m ar Ver m a, J. Heard Mr. Mayank Joshi, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Aditya Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S.S. Adhikari, learned Deputy Advocate General assisted by Mr. B.S. Thind, learned Brief Holder for the State. The learned counsel appearing for the State submitted that the charge- sheet has been filed in the matter before the concerned court. In view of the above submission, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this criminal writ petition has now become infructuous. The Criminal Writ Petition No.1242 of 2020 is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order dated 15.10.2020 stands vacated. ( Alok Ku m ar Ver m a, J.) 0 3 .1 2 .2 0 2 1 JKJ/ Neha |
Petitioner
State
Alok Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
