Non-admitted criminal revision dismissed for want of prosecution as no party turned up on behalf of the revisionist or respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| CRLR No. 41 of 2015 Hon’ble N.S. Dh an ik , J . |
|||
| None turns up on behalf of the revisionist as well as on behalf of the respondents. This is a non-admitted revision. The present criminal revision is dismissed for want of prosecution. |
|||
( N.S. Dhan ik , J.) 25.03.2022 SB |
N.S. Dhanik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
