Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
Application for withdrawal allowed; revision dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRLR No.3 of 2021 Hon’ble R.C. Khulbe, J.
Ms. Sarita Bisht, learned counsel i/b Mr. V.K. Guglani, learned counsel for the revisionist. Mr. S.T. Bhardwaj, learned DAG for the State.
Mr. Lalit Sharma, learned counsel for respondent no.2.
In view of the grounds stated, application for withdrawal (IA 2/21) is allowed. The instant revision is dismissed as not pressed.
(R.C. Khulbe, J.) 25.10.2021
Rdang
R.C. Khulbe
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
