Allowed

Ravindra Alias Rabbu v. State of Uttarkahand

Uttarakhand HC23 Oct 2021BA1/261/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court allowed the first bail application of the accused, who was in judicial custody under IPC 376 and POCSO charges. The court held it to be a fit case for bail as the accused had already served over a year in jail and there was no chance of evidence tampering, directing his release on a personal bond with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

The applicant is directed to be released on bail on executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties.

SL. No	Date	Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures	COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
			BA1 No.261 of 2021 Hon’ble R.C. Khulbe, J. Ms. Shruti Joshi, learned counsel for the applicant. Mr. Amit bhatt, D.A.G, assisted by Mr. Siddhartha Bisht, Brief Holder for the State. This is the first bail application moved on behalf of the accused– Ravindra @ Rabbu, who is in judicial custody in connection with Case Crime No. 42 of 2020, u/s 376/511 of IPC, 7/8 POCSO Act & Section 3(i)(xi) SC/ST Act, registered at Police Station New Tehri, District Tehri Garhwal has sought his release on bail. It is argued that the accused has been falsely implicated; he is languishing in jail since 09.10.2020; he has no criminal history; he is ready to furnish the sureties and may be granted bail. Per contra, learned counsel for the State opposed for bail. In the present matter, the information was submitted by the informant on 09.10.2020 with Police Station Tehri. Accordingly, on the basis of the said information F.I.R NO. 0042 of 2020 was registered against the applicant at the police station. The prosecutrix was medically examined. Her statement was recorded under section 164 Cr.P.C. Accused was arrested on 09.10.2020 on the very same day. As per the statement of the prosecutrix it was simply an attempt to commit the sexual offence. The medical report is in favour of the accused. The accused had already served more than one year. It will take time to conclude the trial. There is no chance for tempering with the evidence; accordingly, without making any comment on the merits, it is a fit case for bail at this stage. The first bail application is thus, allowed and the applicant is directed to be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfactionofthe Court concerned.

SL.
No

Date

Office Notes,
reports, orders or
proceedings or
directions and
Registrar’s order
with Signatures

COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS

BA1 No.261 of 2021
Hon’ble R.C. Khulbe, J.
Ms. Shruti Joshi, learned counsel for the
applicant.
Mr. Amit bhatt, D.A.G, assisted by Mr.
Siddhartha Bisht, Brief Holder for the State.
This is the first bail application moved on
behalf of the accused– Ravindra @ Rabbu, who is
in judicial custody in connection with Case Crime
No. 42 of 2020, u/s 376/511 of IPC, 7/8 POCSO
Act & Section 3(i)(xi) SC/ST Act, registered at
Police Station New Tehri, District Tehri Garhwal
has sought his release on bail.
It is argued that the accused has been falsely
implicated; he is languishing in jail since
09.10.2020; he has no criminal history; he is ready
to furnish the sureties and may be granted bail.
Per contra, learned counsel for the State
opposed for bail.
In the present matter, the information was
submitted by the informant on 09.10.2020 with
Police Station Tehri. Accordingly, on the basis of
the said information F.I.R NO. 0042 of 2020 was
registered against the applicant at the police station.
The prosecutrix was medically examined. Her
statement was recorded under section 164 Cr.P.C.
Accused was arrested on 09.10.2020 on the very
same day. As per the statement of the prosecutrix it
was simply an attempt to commit the sexual
offence. The medical report is in favour of the
accused. The accused had already served more than
one year. It will take time to conclude the trial.
There is no chance for tempering with the evidence;
accordingly, without making any comment on the
merits, it is a fit case for bail at this stage.
The first bail application is thus, allowed and
the applicant is directed to be released on bail on his
executing a personal bond and furnishing two
reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the
satisfactionofthe Court concerned.

of.	Pending application,	if any, stands disposed
Nahid		(R.C. Khulbe, J.) 23.10.2021

of.

Pending application,

if any, stands disposed

Nahid

(R.C. Khulbe, J.)
23.10.2021

Ravindra Alias Rabbu v. State of Uttarkahand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravindra Alias Rabbu v. State of Uttarkahand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bahadur Ram Tamta Vs Sate of Uttarakhand

Sandeep Kumar Alias Sandeep Gujjar Vs State of Uttarakhand

Rajinder Kumar Kaura Vs State of Uttarakhand

Sanjeev Singh Alias Neeraj Vs Narcotics Control Bureau

Mustaq Ahmad Vs State of Uttarkahand

Shivam Sharma Vs State of Uttarakhand