The court closed the contempt petition upon the petitioner's representation that the Writ Court order was complied with and discharged the contempt notices issued to the respondents.
Contempt petition closed and contempt notices discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| CLCON No.61 of 2019 Hon’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J. Mr. Pankaj Semwal, Advocate, |
|||
| holding brief of Mr. Parikshit Saini, | |||
Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Prateek Tripathi, Advocate, |
|||
| holding brief of Mr. Vipul Sharma, Advocate for the respondents. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the order passed by Writ Court has been complied with. In view of the statement made on behalf of the petitioner, the Contempt Petition is closed. Contempt notices issued to the respondents are hereby discharged. ( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.) 17.11.2021 Navin |
Petitioner
Respondents
Manoj Kumar Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
