The writ petition was withdrawn by the petitioner owing to subsequent developments. The court dismissed the matter with liberty to file afresh.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPSS No. 600 of 2020
Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.
Mr. Sandeep Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. P.S. Bisht, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand/respondent no. 1.
The matter is heard through video conferencing.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that owing to certain subsequent developments, he does not want to press the writ petition.
Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to file afresh.
(Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.) 02.07.2020
Pooja
Petitioner
State of Uttarakhand
Sharad Kumar Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
