Suchit Narang v. State of Uttarakhand
Uttarakhand HCBA3/12/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| BA3 No. 12 of 2020 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Ms. Divya Jain, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Lalit Miglani, AGA for the State. List this case on 23.03.2021 to enable the State to get instruction, whether the jail authority will provide the attendant to the applicant. |
|||
| (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 22.03.2021 Sanjay |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Undesignated Applicant
- respondent
State
Coram
AI extract
Ravindra Maithani
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Uttarakhand HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- BA3/12/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court