In a second bail application filed by Jay Dikshit under Section 306 IPC, the High Court of Uttarakhand, relying on the fact that co-accused were already on bail, allowed the bail plea and ordered the applicant's release on personal bond with two sureties.
Release on bail via personal bond and two reliable sureties to the satisfaction of the Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Second Bail Application No. 143 of 2020
Jay Dikshit ...Applicant Versus
State of Uttarakhand ….Respondent
Present:-
Ms. Pushpa Joshi, Senior Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, A.G.A for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Applicant Jay Dikshit, who is in judicial custody, in FIR No. 637 of 2016, under Section 306 IPC, Police Station-Kotwali Haridwar, District Haridwar, has sought his release on bail.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 10.12.2020
Shubham
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant deserves release on bail considering that co-accused have already been granted bail.
Jay Dikshit
State of Uttarakhand
Ravindra Maithani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
