Disposed
Omprakash v. Manager Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd.
Uttarakhand HCWPMS/2893/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
What the court decided
AI extract
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 3 .0 9 . 2 0 2 4 |
MCC No.745 of 2019 (Restoration Application) In WPMS No.2893 of 2014 Hon’ble Alok Ku m ar Ver m a, J. Mr. Yogesh Pacholia, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Piyush Garg, learned counsel for the respondent. |
||
| 3. Mr. Piyush Garg, Advocate submitted that after dismissal of the writ petition, he has no instruction from the respondent. Therefore, he has sought permission to withdraw his vakalatnama. 4. Permission is granted. 5. Notice is issued to the respondent. Steps to be taken within a week, as prayed by the petitioner. 6. List on 19.11.2024. ( Alok Ku m ar Ver m a, J.) 2 3 .0 9 .2 0 2 4 Pant/ |
Petitioner
Respondent
Alok Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court